<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polyglot persistence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benscofield.com/2009/09/polyglot-persistence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benscofield.com/2009/09/polyglot-persistence/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=polyglot-persistence</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Adam &#183; Polyglottin&#8217; your&#160;data</title>
		<link>http://benscofield.com/2009/09/polyglot-persistence/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Adam &#183; Polyglottin&#8217; your&#160;data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benscofield.com/?p=143#comment-42</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://benscofield.com/2009/09/polyglot-persistence/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benscofield.com/?p=143#comment-39</guid>
		<description>@Ivan: Actually, I&#039;ve been thinking about writing a post on the trap of the new and shiny - it certainly seems like Rubyists in particular are more inclined to buy into fads, and I have some ideas on why that is.

@Geoff: :p It certainly doesn&#039;t roll off the tongue (though neither does &quot;polyglot programmer&quot;). I do like PPDB - or maybe &#039;polypers&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ivan: Actually, I&#8217;ve been thinking about writing a post on the trap of the new and shiny &#8211; it certainly seems like Rubyists in particular are more inclined to buy into fads, and I have some ideas on why that is.</p>
<p>@Geoff: :p It certainly doesn&#8217;t roll off the tongue (though neither does &#8220;polyglot programmer&#8221;). I do like PPDB &#8211; or maybe &#8216;polypers&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoffrey Grosenbach</title>
		<link>http://benscofield.com/2009/09/polyglot-persistence/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoffrey Grosenbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benscofield.com/?p=143#comment-38</guid>
		<description>And it&#039;s under 10 syllables! ;-)

Is there a nickname? Maybe PPDB?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it&#8217;s under 10 syllables! ;-)</p>
<p>Is there a nickname? Maybe PPDB?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://benscofield.com/2009/09/polyglot-persistence/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benscofield.com/?p=143#comment-37</guid>
		<description>This happens often, doesn&#039;t it? Why is it so easy to fall into this trap? Are we suckers for shiny new stuff?

I did think a while back that NoSQL was the next big thing, the end of RDBMS... I&#039;m ashamed.

Adding one more database system, to something that already has many different components specialized for one task, doesn&#039;t seem too insurmountable indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This happens often, doesn&#8217;t it? Why is it so easy to fall into this trap? Are we suckers for shiny new stuff?</p>
<p>I did think a while back that NoSQL was the next big thing, the end of RDBMS&#8230; I&#8217;m ashamed.</p>
<p>Adding one more database system, to something that already has many different components specialized for one task, doesn&#8217;t seem too insurmountable indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
